A certain importance attaches to the views on art of painters,and this is the natural place for me to set down what I know of Stricklands opinion of the great artists of the past.I am afraid I have very little worth noting.Strickland was not a conversationalist,and he had no gift for putting what he had to say in the striking phrase that the listener remembers.He had no wit.His humour,as will be seen if I have in any way succeeded in reproducing the manner of his conversation,was sardonic.His repartee was rude.He made one laugh sometimes by speaking the truth,but this is a form of humour which gains its force only by its unusualness;it would cease to amuse if it were commonly practised.

　　Strickland was not,I should say,a man of great intelligence,and his views on painting were by no means out of the ordinary.I never heard him speak of those whose work had a certain analogy with his own－of Cézanne,for instance,or of Van Gogh;and I doubt very much if he had ever seen their pictures.He was not greatly interested in the Impressionists.Their technique imp......